Cost and efficiency
We serve the whole company, not only the finance department.
This page is not organised around our product catalogue. It is organised around the way a manufacturer's own money moves: seven business stages, from R&D through to the tax and audit close. Each stage answers three questions only — where the saving is, which product modules do the work, and which metric verifies it. All sixteen modules have a place on that chain: engineering, procurement, production, sales, marketing, export, tax. We can pick up at any of them.
Two kinds of arithmetic
Cost saving comes in two kinds. Do not mix them
One kind reconciles back to source documents. The other can only be compared before and after, against a business metric. We keep them apart, because a blended “thirty per cent saving” carries no weight with a board, a bank or a tax authority — and because the two are accepted in different ways.
Money you can compute: traceable to source documents
- The super-deduction claimed, and the supporting file behind it
- Export VAT refunds received, and the reconciliation ledger
- Additional tax avoided in a controversy engagement
- Loss-making orders priced below cost, and their share of revenue
- Unit price gaps on same-spec, same-period purchases
- Energy per unit and per tonne; gross margin by cost object once overhead allocation is recomputed
- Capital tied up in slow-moving stock, and dead inventory
Hours you save: comparable only against a business metric
- Hours spent collating purchase-order follow-ups, and how long open items sit
- Effort spent assembling papers, marking them and organising training
- Effort and revision rounds spent recording and producing video
- Search and collation time in technical solution research
- Delivery time, defect count and rework hours for a comparable scope of work
- Time from a new hire's first day to working unsupervised
The second kind carries one hard rule: fix the scope, the effort and the acceptance criteria before the trial starts, then compare before and after. A comparison with no agreed basis convinces nobody.
Three numbers from the project archive
The following are anonymised results from real engagements, shown to illustrate what the first kind looks like. They depend on the facts, evidence and policy environment at the time and are not a promise about any other engagement.
51%
Drop in electricity cost per unit
Electroplating and surface treatment · Jiangsu. Twelve months of daily measurement: output up 4.6×, electricity per unit down 51%, and more than half of all cost did not move with volume.
RMB 10.25m
Seven years of losses, fully attributed
Advanced materials · Jiangsu. A forward-deployed internal audit traced the entire loss to a 1.98-point gross margin gap, itself determined by related-party purchase pricing that accounted for 97.02% of procurement.
RMB 5.4m
Additional tax avoided in a dispute
Manufacturing · East China. The inspection bureau sought RMB 6.3m at 35%. Through supplementary evidence and negotiation, RMB 5.4m of that was avoided.
We do not forecast percentages. The three numbers above already happened; they are not a quotation or a promise for the next engagement. What your company can recover is measured after the scenario diagnostic, on your own data.
Seven business stages
Where the saving is, stage by stage down the process
From project approval through to the tax and audit close, a manufacturer's money moves through roughly these seven stages. For each one we answer three questions only: where the saving is, which product modules do the work, and how you verify it. All sixteen modules have a place on this chain — that is what “serving the whole company” looks like in practice.
Procurement and supply
Production and cost
Sales and collection
Marketing and content
Export and cross-border
Tax, finance and audit
One thing stated plainly: M09–M16 sit directly on the process at stages 01 R&D, 02 procurement, 04 sales training and 05 marketing content. At 03 production and cost, 06 export and 07 tax and audit, the money is computed by M01–M08 — getting process-step cost right takes cost objects, restored material-labour-overhead and energy data, not a model. We are not vague about that line. If a dispute arises, the tax controversy practice takes it directly; it is not a module and is scoped case by case.
One layer that runs through all seven: organisation and knowledge
Every stage above hides the same cost: the critical steps are known to a few long-serving people, it stops when they leave, and a new hire shadows someone for three months. This layer does not recover money at any one stage. It answers whether the work still gets done when the people change.
- M10 Enterprise knowledge base: organise material by product, role or business theme, align terminology and wording, and make source, version and owner explicit so that stale content has a defined way out
- M11 AI teaching video generation: turn existing decks into reusable training video, so machine operation, process SOPs and policy briefings need not be delivered live every year
- M13 AI online assessment: question bank, paper assembly, online sitting, AI-assisted marking and weak-point analysis on one line, with results feeding straight into the next round of remedial training
- Sales Enablement and Assessment System: six modules of content, question bank, case library and certification mechanism, delivered forward-deployed and walked into production with the client
These four read as duplicates but are not: they are content and container. The Sales Enablement system is the content pack and certification mechanism for a commercial role; M10, M11 and M13 are the general platform that carries it — and carries content for other roles too. Paired, the enablement system gains live voice coaching and automated marking, and the AI platform gains a content pack that already exists.
Combinations
Six combinations that decide which modules come first
A module works on its own, but only when several are combined around one business objective do knowledge, training and daily work actually join up. The fourth column is the first step we recommend — start small rather than rolling out everything at once.
| Business objective | Who uses it | Which modules | Where to start |
|---|---|---|---|
| Training and role certification | Training / HR / business units | Knowledge base + AI teaching video + AI online assessment | Take stock of the existing material for one role, and agree the wording and the content owner |
| Raising sales capability | Head of sales | Knowledge base + AI sales call coach + AI online assessment | Pick the customer scenarios for one product line and build the knowledge pack and the pass mark |
| Putting an AI development workflow in place | Head of IT or engineering | AI development workflow and implementation service | Take one real requirement from clarification through to independent acceptance |
| Technical solution research | Engineering / product / pre-sales | AI technical solution researcher + knowledge base | Run one open problem through a full cycle and check every cited source |
| Automating purchase-order follow-up | Head of procurement | AI procurement assistant | Map one follow-up workflow and mark which actions must stay with a person |
| Marketing content production | Head of marketing | AI short video generation + AI teaching video generation | Fix one material library and two themes, produce a batch and review it |
These six combinations cover the eight AI modules only. The work of getting the money right sits in the seven stages above — the finance and tax tools and M01–M08 are scoped and delivered as engagements and priced by person-day, not selected as modules, and we do not blend the two.
How to start
Three ways in, four steps through
Agree the scope and the conditions first, then the schedule; start on a narrow footprint and widen from there. Software, usage and implementation are priced and stated separately, never bundled into one figure.
For: proving out a single, clearly defined scenario
Start with one module
Choose one product module, confirm the number of users or the task volume, and set out training, service period and support. Module service plus an agreed usage allowance, priced to scope.
For: working towards one business objective
Combine around a scenario
Combine the modules you need without being required to buy a whole product line; implement against your account structure, your material and your existing systems, with module fees, integration work and acceptance criteria all stated.
For: specific deployment or process requirements
Bespoke implementation
Assess whether a private or managed deployment applies, define the integration with existing systems and the scope of data processing, and agree maintenance, training and optional hands-on support. Implementation fee plus ongoing service.
STEP 1
Scenario diagnostic
Confirm the business objective, the people and the state of the material, and decide whether the work is worth doing and which stage to enter at.
Deliverable: Scenario list and evaluation metrics
STEP 2
Scope and plan
Confirm modules, deployment, interfaces, fees and where responsibility sits, and write the boundaries into the plan.
Deliverable: Deliverables list and implementation plan
STEP 3
Trial and verification
Use it for real in the agreed scenario, check output quality and workflow, and compare before and after on the basis fixed in section 01.
Deliverable: Trial record and acceptance result
STEP 4
Rollout and maintenance
Train the people who will use it, arrange content maintenance and ongoing support, then extend from one scenario to the adjacent stage.
Deliverable: User documentation and service arrangement
Forward-deployed engagements are priced by person-day and by role, with travel billed as incurred; the AI modules are priced by usage scale and implementation scope. The two bases differ and are never blended — they appear as separate lines on the quotation.
Boundaries
Three boundaries, stated up front
Results are measured against business metrics
Fix the trial scope, the effort and the acceptance criteria first, then compare the change. Each company is assessed on its own results; we do not offer another client's numbers as a promise, and we do not forecast percentages.
Judgement calls stay with people
Content review, score moderation, solution selection and anything that goes outside the company get an explicit confirmation step in the workflow. On the finance and tax side the rule is harder still: without L3 or L4 evidence, a conclusion may not move from “directional” to “confirmed”.
The scope of data processing is written down
Storage location, model calls and third-party services are distinguished, and the data flow is described for the deployment you choose. Of the six finance and tax tools, only Anxinshui retrieves data once the company authorises it; the rest run locally and no data leaves the premises. For the AI modules, what may leave the building is confirmed item by item in the implementation plan.
Tell us which stage the problem sits in before we discuss which tools to use. The first conversation needs no sensitive material from you.
Have a specific problem and want a professional view on it?
Tell us the facts and we will tell you what kind of problem it is, how it is normally handled, and how far it can realistically be pushed on the evidence you have.